A critical discourse analysis of the language of hospice enrollment: A multiple case study of patient, family, nurse, and physician discourse in the United States

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorLiu, Fuqin
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFredland, Nina
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEnnis, Joyce
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHamilton, Patti
dc.creatorParker, Robert 1962-
dc.creator.orcid0000-0003-0404-9226
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-07T20:19:12Z
dc.date.available2024-06-07T20:19:12Z
dc.date.created2024-05
dc.date.issued2024-05
dc.date.submittedMay 2024
dc.date.updated2024-06-07T20:19:12Z
dc.description.abstractThe Medicare Hospice Benefit, established in 1982, is integral to end-of-life care. Despite the demonstrated benefits, hospice enrollment among Medicare beneficiaries continues to decline. In 2021, only 47.3% of eligible Medicare decedents utilized hospice services. Although all racial and ethnic groups’ enrollment numbers are low compared to the opportunity for enrollment, the underrepresentation is most significant of non-White populations. The overall underutilization of hospice services calls for a reevaluation of the hospice dialogue. Our investigation adopted the principles of critical discourse analysis, as conceptualized by Fairclough in 1993 to answer the question: How do discourses of patients, caregivers, nurses, and medical directors reveal the social structures and power relationships that shape hospice enrollment? Using critical discourse analysis, we examined the role of language used to reveal hospice enrollment discourses. Using a multiple case study design, we recruited and segmented participants into four distinct case groups: patients, their primary family caregivers, the hospice registered nurses, and medical directors responsible for the initiation of hospice enrollment. We then incorporated critical discourse analysis as a secondary design by using Fairclough’s three-dimensional framework to analyze the structural, relational, and symbolic dimensions of discourse in the interview texts based on the case groups positional reference to the study’s question. Our aim was to reveal the power relationships and social structures to emphasize or minimize hospice enrollment decisions. This study’s findings revealed three dominant discourses: Decision Dynamics, Help, and Beliefs and Believe. The inferences drawn from this study emphasize the need for a patient-centric modality in hospice enrollment decisions that fully recognizes and engages with the interrelated connections of familial dynamics, societal norms, and personal sovereignty.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.uri
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11274/16213
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.subjectpatients
dc.subjectprimary family caregivers
dc.subjecthospice registered nurses
dc.subjecthospice medical directors
dc.subject.otherhospice
dc.subject.otherenrollment
dc.subject.otherunderutilization
dc.subject.othercritical discourse analysis
dc.subject.otherlanguage
dc.subject.othermultiple case study
dc.titleA critical discourse analysis of the language of hospice enrollment: A multiple case study of patient, family, nurse, and physician discourse in the United States
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.collegeCollege of Nursing
thesis.degree.departmentNursing
thesis.degree.disciplineNursing
thesis.degree.grantorTexas Woman's University
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.programAPA 7th edition
thesis.degree.schoolDenton

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PARKER-PRIMARY-2024.pdf
Size:
2.23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
proquest_license.txt
Size:
6.37 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.05 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Nursing-Dissertations