Non-invasive brain stimulation and pain neuroscience education in the cognitive-affective treatment of chronic low back pain: Evidence and future directions

dc.contributor.authorAlcon, Cory A.
dc.contributor.authorWang-Price, Sharon
dc.creator.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6873-3310
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T21:06:03Z
dc.date.available2023-07-31T21:06:03Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionArticle originally published in International Evidence and future directions. Frontiers in Pain Research, 3. English. Published online 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.959609
dc.description.abstractChronic low back pain (CLBP) is among the leading causes of disability worldwide. Beyond the physical and functional limitations, people's beliefs, cognitions, and perceptions of their pain can negatively influence their prognosis. Altered cognitive and affective behaviors, such as pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia, are correlated with changes in the brain and share a dynamic and bidirectional relationship. Similarly, in the presence of persistent pain, attentional control mechanisms, which serve to organize relevant task information are impaired. These deficits demonstrate that pain may be a predominant focus of attentional resources, leaving limited reserve for other cognitively demanding tasks. Cognitive dysfunction may limit one's capacity to evaluate, interpret, and revise the maladaptive thoughts and behaviors associated with catastrophizing and fear. As such, interventions targeting the brain and resultant behaviors are compelling. Pain neuroscience education (PNE), a cognitive intervention used to reconceptualize a person's pain experiences, has been shown to reduce the effects of pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. However, cognitive deficits associated with chronic pain may impact the efficacy of such interventions. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of anxiety, depression, and pain. In addition, as with the treatment of most physical and psychological diagnoses, an active multimodal approach is considered to be optimal. Therefore, combining the neuromodulatory effects of NIBS with a cognitive intervention such as PNE could be promising. This review highlights the cognitive-affective deficits associated with CLBP while focusing on current evidence for cognition-based therapies and NIBS.en_US
dc.identifier.citationThis is a published version of an article that is available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.959609. Recommended citation: Alcon, C. A., & Wang-Price, S. (2022). Non-invasive brain stimulation and pain neuroscience education in the cognitive-affective treatment of chronic low back pain: Evidence and future directions. Frontiers in Pain Research, 3. This item has been deposited in accordance with publisher copyright and licensing terms and with the author’s permission.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11274/15300
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.959609
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiersen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Alcon and Wang-Price.
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0
dc.subjectPain catastrophizingen_US
dc.subjectKinesiophobiaen_US
dc.subjectTranscranial direct current simulationen_US
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulationen_US
dc.subjectCognitionen_US
dc.titleNon-invasive brain stimulation and pain neuroscience education in the cognitive-affective treatment of chronic low back pain: Evidence and future directionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
WP-Non-invasive brain stimulation and pain neuroscience education in the cognitive-affective treatment of chronic low back pain.pdf
Size:
443.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.68 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: