• Login
    View Item 
    •   The Repository@TWU Home
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Colleges & Departments
    • College of Health Sciences
    • School of Physical Therapy - Faculty & Staff
    • View Item
    •   The Repository@TWU Home
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Colleges & Departments
    • College of Health Sciences
    • School of Physical Therapy - Faculty & Staff
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effectiveness of Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback-triggered Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Knee Rehabilitation

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Effectiveness of Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback-Triggered Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Knee Rehabilitation.pdf (5.673Mb)
    Date
    2009-08
    Author
    Boucher, Tony
    Wang, Sharon
    Trudelle-Jackson, Elaine
    Olson, Sharon
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation initiated by a surface electromyographic biofeedback threshold (sEMG-triggered NMES) has been studied in populations of patients with neurological problems, but has not been applied to orthopedic populations.
     
    OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this single-blinded, random ized clinical trial was to investigate sEMG-triggered NMES on knee extension active range of motion (AROM), function, and torque in patients with post-operative arthroscopic knee surgery.
     
    METHODS: Twenty-five participants were randomly assigned to either: (1) sEMG-triggered NMES with exercise group, or (2) exercise-only comparison group. Participants received outpatient physical therapy treattment 2 to 3 times a week for 12 visits. Knee AROM and function determined by the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) were collected at the first, sixth, and twelfth visits. Peak isometric extensor torque was assessed using an electromechanical dynamometer at 3 months post surgery. Two analysis of variance tests with repeated measures were used to analyze knee AROM and LEFS data. An independent samples t-test was used to analyze the peak torque index (%) of the involved extremity compared to the uninvolved.
     
    RESULTS: A significant difference in AROM was found between groups. No significant difference was found between groups in the LEFS, nor in the peak isometric extensor torque. A 72.5% strength deficit was found compared to the uninvolved extremity.
     
    CONCLUSION: Using sEMG-triggered NMES intervention improved extension AROM but did not improve functionor torque.
     
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/11274/13536
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953339/pdf/najspt-04-100.pdf
    Collections
    • School of Physical Therapy - Faculty & Staff

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV